And so in the end, the question remains:
If you need a waiver for CIMT, why does it matter at all to you what would happen to a different person who needed a waiver for illegal presence?
well, I believe you have to give the best explanation you have concerning the situation... TRuth Matters Most...
HE that has started a good work in you shall complete it... JESUS...THE WAY.. THE TRUTH.. THE LIFE...
And so in the end, the question remains:
If you need a waiver for CIMT, why does it matter at all to you what would happen to a different person who needed a waiver for illegal presence?
Genaral knowledge maybe!
Except that he seems to think he gets to choose which route to go - which is why I'm concerned. After all, if it was just for general knowledge, he probably would have said "hey, I'm just curious -- are criminal charges harder to overcome than illegal presence"? rather than this weird scenario.
I am not a lawyer. Nothing I post is legal advice. I read, I research, I learn.
I don't accept Friend Requests or Private Messages. Please post immigration questions in the open forum where all members can contribute to the thread as well as learn from it.
I think the question assumes he has an option of waiting until 5+ years have passed since the CIMT and then applying under the circumstances of hypothetical case #1 or of applying now under circumstances of hypothetical case #2.
I don't know if this is true of in-country CIMT issues, but I have certainly seen COs declare people inadmissible for CIMTs from long, long ago (20 years in some cases) so I do not think 5 years passing is a guarantee of anything. You are going to have to disclose your CIMT (they know about it anyway) and see what they do.
when could one be certain he or she has CIMT or illegal presence charges. I happen not to be sure what I am charged of. But one thing I am certain is that ICE agents gave me " A notice of intent to reinstate a prior order of deportation" because of an illegal re-entry in the US only 6 weeks after I departed voluntarely.
Now is it up to me to guess or find out what exactly I am accused of???
Or is it a well documented paper that must be served
if xclent wants simple numbers - answers are available in the annual reports on visa ineligibilties (State Deparment) http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/FY07...ortTableXX.pdf
Overstay waiver is more common, and in 2007 represented a higher percentage of the denials than was the case for CIMT.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks