Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: Which waiver is harder to get approved (CIMT or ILLEGAL PRESENCE)

  1. #21
    Newbie
    Points: 4,046, Level: 26
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 54
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranTagger Second Class1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    19
    Points
    4,046
    Level
    26
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Time Online
    10 Hrs 9 Mins 26 Secs
    Avg. Time Online
    33 Secs
    well, I believe you have to give the best explanation you have concerning the situation... TRuth Matters Most...
    HE that has started a good work in you shall complete it... JESUS...THE WAY.. THE TRUTH.. THE LIFE...

  2. #22
    Cum Laude
    Points: 5,809, Level: 32
    Level completed: 46%, Points required for next Level: 191
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation First ClassVeteran5000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,193
    Points
    5,809
    Level
    32
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
    Time Online
    N/A
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    And so in the end, the question remains:

    If you need a waiver for CIMT, why does it matter at all to you what would happen to a different person who needed a waiver for illegal presence?

  3. #23
    Newbie
    Points: 3,026, Level: 22
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 24
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    24
    Points
    3,026
    Level
    22
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Time Online
    N/A
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    Genaral knowledge maybe!

  4. #24
    Cum Laude
    Points: 5,809, Level: 32
    Level completed: 46%, Points required for next Level: 191
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation First ClassVeteran5000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,193
    Points
    5,809
    Level
    32
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
    Time Online
    N/A
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    Quote Originally Posted by cancer View Post
    Genaral knowledge maybe!
    Except that he seems to think he gets to choose which route to go - which is why I'm concerned. After all, if it was just for general knowledge, he probably would have said "hey, I'm just curious -- are criminal charges harder to overcome than illegal presence"? rather than this weird scenario.
    I am not a lawyer. Nothing I post is legal advice. I read, I research, I learn.

    I don't accept Friend Requests or Private Messages. Please post immigration questions in the open forum where all members can contribute to the thread as well as learn from it.

  5. #25
    Newbie
    Points: 3,393, Level: 24
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 157
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    59
    Points
    3,393
    Level
    24
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
    Time Online
    23 Mins 2 Secs
    Avg. Time Online
    1 Secs
    I think the question assumes he has an option of waiting until 5+ years have passed since the CIMT and then applying under the circumstances of hypothetical case #1 or of applying now under circumstances of hypothetical case #2.

    I don't know if this is true of in-country CIMT issues, but I have certainly seen COs declare people inadmissible for CIMTs from long, long ago (20 years in some cases) so I do not think 5 years passing is a guarantee of anything. You are going to have to disclose your CIMT (they know about it anyway) and see what they do.

  6. #26
    Newbie
    Points: 4,339, Level: 27
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 61
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    88
    Points
    4,339
    Level
    27
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Time Online
    4 Hrs 30 Mins 11 Secs
    Avg. Time Online
    14 Secs
    when could one be certain he or she has CIMT or illegal presence charges. I happen not to be sure what I am charged of. But one thing I am certain is that ICE agents gave me " A notice of intent to reinstate a prior order of deportation" because of an illegal re-entry in the US only 6 weeks after I departed voluntarely.

    Now is it up to me to guess or find out what exactly I am accused of???
    Or is it a well documented paper that must be served

  7. #27
    Junior Member
    Points: 4,691, Level: 28
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 9
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!
    douginguam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Guam
    Posts
    357
    Points
    4,691
    Level
    28
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 36 Times in 33 Posts
    Time Online
    3 Hrs 21 Mins 8 Secs
    Avg. Time Online
    11 Secs
    if xclent wants simple numbers - answers are available in the annual reports on visa ineligibilties (State Deparment) http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/FY07...ortTableXX.pdf
    Overstay waiver is more common, and in 2007 represented a higher percentage of the denials than was the case for CIMT.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •