PDA

View Full Version : A couple points to hit on for the next CIR...


IBMMuseum
10-27-2007, 12:20 AM
Here are a couple items I am going to try with my Congressional representatives, and ask that you look them over for endorsement to all of your representives too. Both of my examples stem from U.S. military service as it pertains to legal immigration, so relatively safe subjects as far as CIR Phase II would be concerned (if there was any rationality there at all). And I'm a would-be "poster boy" for them, lucky me.

AOS Interviews for K-1/K-2/K-3/K-4: Ok, AOS aspects can be expedited, but what happens for those cases that the wheels turn too slow before the servicemember spouse/stepparent would deploy overseas? The AOS interview needs the servicemember present to interview, or it is rescheduled for a date that they can attend. In a day and age (and as Laurel brings up, what if that "qualifying relative" is killed in service to the United States?) that the would-be immigrant cannot adjust to LPR status for sometimes over a year or more of deployment also further delays their citizenship.

It's also kind of wacky that a servicemember's spouse/stepchildren could probabably go through an IV Consular interview without any trouble in the same circumstances of them not being present...

I've seen a press article on at least one servicemember getting married by phone (to another USC, so the only "legal" aspect they are doing is that remote marriage), so why can't there be something able to be done about AOS interviews remotely? That sort of marriage ceremony was legally recognized (if USCIS would be allowed to rule on it, they would frown that the marriage couldn't be "consumated" in that circumstance, and thus was invalid). Aren't the conditions penalizing the servicemember's family for his/her service to the United States?

Adoption of stepchildren: USCIS says that they must be in an LPR status (see above) and physically present with the stepparent for a two year period of time. A deployment "resets" that counter! Once again, when talking lengthy deployments, stepchildren can easily "age-out" of adoptive ability under USCIS requirements.

Today I did a head-spinning call to the USCIS military "helpline" (different number, same crappy service) on the N-600. She wasn't able to tell me anything about adoption other than that for orphans. It was even suggested that after the adoption we could apply for U.S. passports for the kids (requiring proof of U.S. citizenship) as help with the N-600 process (which provides proof of U.S. citizenship) and to "call" them when the adoption was complete to see if the kids could become citizens that way.

Maybe this is a "question for Laurel" in a way:

From a legal Mexican judgement my wife has full custody of the kids, her ex is truthfully listed as total willful abandonment the children and her for longer than seven years...

They don't even have LPR status yet, and I wouldn't think my state is empowered for any adoption judgement in that regard...

I have no legal status in Mexico other than my marriage to a Mexican citizen...

IBMMuseum
10-28-2007, 04:37 AM
Aspects of international adoptions are expected to change soon when the United States signs the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption. Although it may not be many of the situations we see on this forum, I reviewed the documents to how it could impact my family (Mexico has previously signed). It is up for comments currently, http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/HagueConv100407.pdf is probably the best starting point.

Laura
10-28-2007, 04:54 AM
I haven't commented, but this stuff is really interesting. I'm sure that there are a lot of people who would benefit from the issues you are discussing. I hope you find some listening ears for these ideas/concepts.

IBMMuseum
10-28-2007, 06:20 AM
I haven't commented, but this stuff is really interesting. I'm sure that there are a lot of people who would benefit from the issues you are discussing. I hope you find some listening ears for these ideas/concepts.

The most intriguing area is that a child could have been EWI or overstay for a long period of time, but if ultimately from another signing country (again, Mexico for an example) that country has a say in the child's fitness for adoption (yes, that may have even been the way before, and truthfully any country has a say with their citizens)...

I do recognize that adoption can raise many issues, especially on an international stage. It isn't a desire for my wife and I to put my stepchildren's biological father (current whereabouts unknown) permanently out of the picture, just to gain a tighter bond in our family with two parents legally able to act on behalf of the children. Trying to do the "right thing" (from my viewpoint) has too many roadblocks thrown up, although I realize why those are in place.

USCIS has planned a separate set of petitions for these cases (and they will be lengthy, because it has to consider the fitness for adoption angles in both countries), Lord help us all with their "Reverse Midas Touch" in these matters to make things infinitely more complicated...