PDA

View Full Version : Examples of approved HSLs adjudicated in Panama


Cynthia
06-27-2007, 05:02 PM
Resources for your extreme hardship/I-601 waiver packet:

Tips for Writing the HSL (http://immigrate2us.net/forum/showthread.php?t=83)

Laurel Scott's Memo on the I-601 (http://immigrate2us.net/forum/showpost.php?p=709&postcount=1)

Some Supporting Document Tips (http://immigrate2us.net/forum/showthread.php?t=3142)

Help for HIV Waivers (http://immigrate2us.net/forum/showthread.php?t=96)

--------------



This is a letter Courtesy of Member Lulu ~ VENEZUELA


Here's my hardship letter for both I-601 & I-212 waivers, filed in Caracas, Venezuela and approved at USCIS Panama City on Dec. 22, 2005 for previous unlawful presence of 1+ years and deportation.

***Please note: I have reason to believe that this letter was not a major factor (if any) in the decision, based on a conversation with the adjudicating officer. Instead, she was more concerned with our relationship validity, his case history/circumstances/background, and my current at-risk pregnancy of which she requested documentation. The decision was made in the course of our conversation.
.................................................. .................................................. ...

May 6, 2005

I, USC, declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States, that the forgoing is true and correct.

I am submitting this affidavit in support of the I-601 Waiver of Grounds of Excludability for my husband, HUSBAND (A# xx-xxx-xxx, NVC Case # 2004xxxxxx).

HARDSHIPS TO ME, THE U.S. CITIZEN
If HUSBAND is not admitted to the United States, I will suffer extreme and unusual hardship above and beyond what I have already suffered. Already since his departure, I have had to give up practicing real estate, a career for which I had worked very hard to become licensed in and professionally established. In the real estate practice, because I was not paid a salary and was dependant on commissions, ample savings were a necessity to fall back on. I was unable to afford to wait for those commissions after our savings were exhausted for legal fees associated with HUSBAND’s deportation, and was forced to seek other career options.

I feel deeply compelled each day to reunite with my husband and share our lives together as we once did and as we have every right to do. However, doing so in Venezuela would greatly endanger my safety, cause significant psychological stress, strain my relationship with my family, completely deplete our finances, eliminate my plans to pursue a graduate degree and end our dreams of starting a family of our own.

I. GRAVE SAFETY CONCERNS
I will face significant, potentially life-threatening risks to my personal safety if I move to Venezuela to join my husband. Due in part to the strained economic and turbulent political situation, there is constant unrest in most metropolitan areas of the country. There are regular riots and demonstrations, kidnappings, murders, robberies and ongoing violence. Even in the best of neighborhoods, there are regular incidents and police raids are common.

Recent anti-U.S. and anti-Bush sentiments generated by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez have sparked additional violence against U.S. Citizens there. The web sites of the U.S. Embassy in Caracas and the U.S. Department of State contain lengthy warnings for U.S. citizens in Venezuela (see Exhibit A). On my 2 visits there, my husband has had to keep constant watch over me, never allowing me out of his sight, and trying to limit our conversations in public as I do not speak Spanish and would stand out immediately as a target. As difficult as it is for him to try to keep me safe for a short visit, if I were to reside there permanently, the toll this stress will have on both of us – the constant fear for my safety - is immeasurable.

II. FUTURE FAMILY AND MEDICAL CONCERNS
It is medically imperative that I start our family in the very near future. I have increased risks of infertility, miscarriage and pre-term labor due to a surgery I have had to my cervix. The surgery, a Cone Biopsy, was performed to remove abnormal (pre-cancerous) cells from my cervix after I was diagnosed with Cervical Dysplasia. I have not had further problems with the dysplasia at this time, but the surgery weakened my cervix, very potentially affecting my ability to conceive or hold a pregnancy (See Exhibit B).

When I conceive, my doctors have told me that I will have to be very closely monitored. If my cervix is not strong enough, medical intervention will be necessary to prevent me from miscarrying or going into premature labor. If, however, I were unable to conceive due to scarring of my cervical tissue, infertility options would have to be explored first; all of them would require my husband’s presence and ready availability. Most women are capable of bearing their first child without difficulty through the age of 35; fertility and uncomplicated pregnancy rates drop significantly after that. Due to my already present risk of severe complications, doctors have advised me not to wait any longer to attempt my first pregnancy.

Here in the U.S., I am not only confident that I will have the expert care I will need and access to advanced medical facilities, but I also have excellent insurance through my employer which will cover my medical expenses. However, without HUSBAND’s financial support (which is impossible to provide from Venezuela, where an average months pay is only about $150-$200), I would not be able to afford having a baby, especially if I am ordered to bed-rest throughout the pregnancy (therefore unable to work) to prevent pre-term delivery. Additionally, I can not raise a child alone, when my husband, who is my greatest source of emotional support and would be my only source of financial support, is 3000 miles away from me. This would be an extreme hardship for myself, as well as for my child who would have to grow up deprived of his/her father.

If I am living in Venezuela on the other hand, I will not have medical insurance and it will be impossible to have access to even a remotely comparable level of medical technology and expertise. With infant mortality rates at 24/1000 births (4x higher than the 6/1000 in the U.S.), and inadequate technology to ensure a safe pregnancy to term, I will be placing my fetus or baby’s life at risk if I try to begin my family in Venezuela. (See Exhibits C and B).

It would be a cruel and extreme hardship to subject my child to the choices of growing up in the safety, security and proper education of the U.S. without his/her father or to grow up in a poverty-stricken Third-World country with him (see Exhibit E). Without HUSBAND’s presence here in the United States, under these circumstances, I could not attempt to start a family.

Also, if the pre-cancerous cells which cause cervical dysplasia recur, they may not be adequately detected with the technology available in Venezuela (“the healing and scarring process after a cone biopsy may make it difficult to identify abnormal tissue in the future”). If this condition is not treated, it often will grow into an invasive cervical cancer (see Exhibit B).

Additionally, I have experienced many episodes of shortness of breath, severe palpitations, and insomnia in the past year. After ruling out a heart condition and other ailments with a physical, an EKG, and blood tests, my doctor concluded that my symptoms were indicative of anxiety attacks from great stress. If I cannot eliminate the stress (i.e. have my husband back), these attacks will continue and worsen, leading to Anxiety Disorder and Depression (See Exhibit D).

THE HOLMES-RAHE SOCIAL READJUSTMENT RATING SCALE
In 1967 Thomas H. Holmes, M.D. and Richard H. Rahe, M.D. published "The Social Readjustment Rating Scale" in the prestigious Journal of Psychosomatic Research. This scale measures vulnerability to medical illness as a result of stress. It is now famous and still widely used; its efficacy is well established. For instance, in December 2000 in “Educational and Psychological Measurement” Judith A. Scully, Henry Tosi and Kevin Banning re-evaluated the use of this instrument. The abstract of their article states:

"The authors conclude that, in sum, life change events remain useful predictors of stress related-symptom scores and that the SRRS is a robust instrument for identifying the potential for the occurrence of stress-related outcomes and is, therefore, a useful tool..."

The scale uses the weighting of Life Changes Units (LCU's) as a means of predicting vulnerability to medical illness. For instance, a marital separation would accrue 65 LCU's and an outstanding personal achievement would accrue 28 LCU's. In other words, significant life changes, positive and negative, are significant variables in the development of medical illness. It is not possible to predict exactly which illness might occur. However, degree of vulnerability can be predicted. Pre-existing conditions, (such as my previous bout with cervical dysplasia) are presumed to be highly vulnerable to exacerbation. The predictive ranges of the SRRS are:

LCU 0-150: No significant risk
LCU 150-199: 35% Chance of illness or injury in two year period
LCU 200-299: 51% Chance of illness or injury in two year period
LCU 300 +: 80% Chance of illness or injury in two year period

The scale was applied on the assumed basis that I was forced to move to Venezuela. My score on this instrument was an astounding 501, with the following analysis, “This score indicates major life crisis and is highly predictive (80%) of serious physical illness within the next 2 years”. On the other hand, if HUSBAND were able to return to the U.S., thus eliminating the hardships/stress factors, the score would drop dramatically to 64 (no significant risk).

The Holmes-Rahe SRRS also demonstrates a very important fact widely recognized in the health sciences. Stress and other risk factors not only exist as independent influences, they interact dynamically. In other words, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. I will be subjected to several factors whose interactions contribute exponentially to my experience of hardship. Each interacts with the other in a manner that heightens their mutual impact. Therefore, the totality of hardship factors exceeds measurement.

III. FAMILY TIES IN THE U.S.
I was born and raised in the U.S. and my entire family lives nearby. I have absolutely no family anywhere in South America. I am very close to both of my parents, my sister, and my 5-year-old niece who has lived with me or near me for most of her life. My mom and sister are my best friends; being separated from them would be devastating. Since neither of them drives, and my father moved away, they both depend on me for many essentials, including grocery shopping and getting to doctor’s appointments. My niece, NIECE, is emotionally attached to me and gets very sad and upset when I’m away, even for a couple of days. If I were to move to Venezuela, it would cause her and my sister hardships in addition to my own. When her mother (my sister) works on evenings and weekends, I am the one who cares for her, plays with her, takes her on outings and tucks her in at night (her father lives 4 hours away and rarely visits). NIECE has become such a part of my life; leaving her would be like abandoning my own child. In addition, she loves and admires HUSBAND and asks for him every day, unable to understand why he isn’t here. Between her father’s absence and her grandfather’s recent departure, HUSBAND’s presence can provide a stable, daily male figure in her life that she does not otherwise have. If HUSBAND is not allowed to return, NIECE will suffer great distress wondering why another man she loves is gone.

I love my family dearly and have never gone more than a couple of months without seeing them. I wouldn’t be able to afford plane tickets, averaging $700- $1000, to visit my family (see below), and phone calls would be too expensive to make very often. This would also greatly add to the growing anxiety attacks I already experience, and is likely to trigger depression (See Exhibit D).

Additionally, HUSBAND only has an aunt and 2 cousins in Venezuela who live in different cities. Due to my inability to speak Spanish, I felt alienated when I spent time with them, and will surely be isolated, and terribly lonely without friends and family to talk to. Being separated from my full, close and loving family will create great emotional distress and hardship to myself and to my family, all of whom are U.S. Citizens. If HUSBAND is not admitted back to the United States, I will never be united with my entire family at the same time.

III. FINANCIAL HARDSHIP AND LACK OF EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY
Here in the U.S. I am employed with an annual salary of $39,000 plus wonderful benefits including tuition reimbursement. I intend to begin graduate school to expand my opportunities in my current field (which I am ill-equipped for with my real estate background), especially since my employer will reimburse a significant portion of my tuition. If I were to move to Venezuela, I would have to leave my job with virtually no prospects to look forward to, and graduate school would no longer be an option (both since I don’t understand Spanish). In addition to that, this would also shatter my chances of future employability in the United States once we are finally able to return. Since it will be impossible to maintain my career in Venezuela (due in major part to my inability to speak the language), my professional standing and career would be ruined.

The unemployment rate in Venezuela is 18%. With about 47% of the population living below the poverty line, it is virtually impossible that I, an American who doesn’t speak Spanish, will be able to secure any employment at all. The minimum wage is about $188/month, though many earn less and have no benefits. HUSBAND has had great difficulty finding any permanent employment, with offers of less than minimum wage, part-time or temporary work, and occasional contract assignments such as translating documents. Even with both of us working, this would not be enough to live on; with only HUSBAND working, it will mean certain poverty (see Exhibit E)

It would also mean that my credit rating would be destroyed. With credit card bills nearing $10,000 (many stemming from legal fees related to HUSBAND’s case), I would be unable to maintain any payments whatsoever (see Exhibit F). My current earnings allow me to pay my bills as well as provide money to my husband so that he may maintain a reasonable and secure standard of living. After making all payments, I have just enough money left over for phone calls to Venezuela and can barely afford the airfare to visit more than once or twice a year. In Venezuela, without my current salary to rely upon, not only would we be subjected to the extreme hardship of living in horrifically sub-standard conditions, but also we would have nothing to return to the U.S. with except damaged credit and debts. However, with HUSBAND in the U.S., he will be gainfully employed and, without the burden of maintaining a second household, our combined income would allow us to quickly pay our debts, buy a home and start a family; none of this will be possible if he is not here.

IV. I DO NOT SPEAK SPANISH
As I have indicated, I do not speak Spanish. This will contribute to and exacerbate the extreme hardships I have already discussed. My lack of Spanish language skills in Venezuela will:
• nullify my efforts to find employment
• make me more vulnerable to crimes targeted to Americans
• make me extremely isolated socially
• make regular activities such as shopping and going to church extremely difficult

VI. HUSBAND ’S CASE FACTS:
HUSBAND was brought to the U.S. by his mother with a valid non-immigrant visa when he was only 11 years old. His mother applied for political asylum but the case was denied. Her attorney filed an appeal and obtained an Employment Authorization Card for her while it was pending. When HUSBAND turned 18, he too received a Social Security Card and Employment Authorization. The same attorney continued to re-apply for the Employment Authorizations annually under the pretense that the appeal was still pending. After working lawfully in the U.S. and paying taxes for several years, the Work Authorization Cards were denied at renewal in 2002 because it was discovered that the appeal for asylum had been denied several years before.

Their attorney had never informed them of the denial of the appeal and falsely misled them into believing that they were living and working legally in the U.S. for many years (see Exhibit G).

HUSBAND and I were already engaged when his Work Authorization was not renewed in 2002, and married on November 12 of that year. While seeking legal advice, we discovered that a deportation order had been issued against his mother (and him, inclusively) in 1997 when he was only 14. He was 20 when we found out and realized too late that he had already remained in the U.S. illegally for all those years without having known it. We were advised by several attorneys to file the I-130 Petition promptly and wait for it to be adjudicated here in the U.S. Sadly, 1 ½ years into our marriage, while the I-130 was still pending, HUSBAND was detained during a routine traffic stop when his driver’s license was checked, and was deported 6 weeks later following a painful and costly legal battle. Now, following his interview at the U.S. Consulate in Caracas, Venezuela, he respectfully seeks this waiver to return home to me.

SUMMARY
I ask you sincerely to take into consideration all these hardships and unbearable decisions that I face while separated from my husband. If HUSBAND is denied permission to return to the U.S., you will be placing me in an impossible dilemma, asking me to face risking my life and the lives, well-being and very existence of my future children – future citizens of the United States – by moving to Venezuela to reunite with my husband in fulfillment of our sacred, profound marital bond. I would also be forsaking my relationship with my family and my secure employment and career opportunities.

Please take into consideration that HUSBAND was only a child when he came to the U.S. and was entirely ignorant of his own status until he reached the age of 20, when it was too late. He had no reason to question the valid Social Security Card and Work Authorizations he was given. He is an innocent victim of an unethical attorney. He did not choose to come to the U.S. at age 11 and did not choose to overstay his visa and remain here in an illegal status. He is a hard-working, law-abiding person who spent more than half his life in the U.S. and contributed greatly to his community with his musical talents and through his church.

I need to have my husband here with me in the U.S. I love my country and am a very proud American citizen. I would not believe that my own country would keep me separated from my husband, when the government has fully recognized our marriage in approving our I-130 petition. Doing so would shatter the confidence I have in my own government to protect me, as keeping me separated from my husband would destroy me.

Please allow HUSBAND to come home to me, so that we may once again live together as husband and wife. Please give us the opportunity to live the American Dream – to start a business together, buy a home, and raise a family – in the safety and security of the great U.S.A. that so many Americans take for granted every day.

Sincerely,

USC
.................................................. .................................................. ......

Exhibit Contents and Sources

Exhibit A - Safety concerns in Venezuela

Consular Information Sheet on Venezuela
http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1059.html

Current Situation in Venezuela (Consular Announcement)
http://caracas.usembassy.gov/situation.html

Latin America's New Fidel (Herald Tribune)
http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/04/26/opinion/edbremmer.php

More Friction Between US and Venezuela
http://www2.rnw.nl/rnw/en/currentaffairs/region/southamerica/ven050325?view=Standard

Murders per Capita - Venezuela 4th Highest
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/cri_mur_cap

Exhibit B - Reproductive health issues

Letter from Dr. xxxx, MD

Medline Plus - Cold Knife Cone Biopsy
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003910.htm

Cone Biopsy…
http://my.webmd.com/hw/womens_conditions/hw27835.asp

Cervical Cancer
http://www.oncologychannel.com/cervicalcancer/

National Cervical Cancer Coalition
http://www.nccc-online.org/

Exhibit C - Infant Mortality Rates in Venezuela
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/print/ve.html

Exhibit D - Anxiety Disorders
http://adam.about.com/reports/000028_3.htm

Exhibit E - Poverty, Unemployment, & Minimum Wage

Poverty Line and Unemployment Rates
http://worldfacts.us/Venezuela.htm

Minimum Wage in Venezuela
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050427/venezuela_minimum_wage.html?.v=1

Exhibit F - Copies of 2 credit card bills

Exhibit G - Copies of Hubby's Social Security Card and EADs

Cynthia
06-27-2007, 05:39 PM
HSL Courtesy of member Spouse – ECUADOR


This is a ROUGH DRAFT of our waiver. Our waiver was for my husband for unlawful presence over 1 year. It was filed in Ecuador.

I have substituted the terms USC and ALIEN for our names. Additionally, I have substituted SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY for the name of my husband’s country of origin. This is only a precaution that is hopefully completely unnecessary.


RE: ALIEN
Case Number: XXXXXXXX

I. HARDSHIP TO THE U.S. CITIZEN (USC)

If ALIEN is not admitted to the United States, USC really would suffer severe hardship. Her health conditions would prevent her from living in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY with her husband. At the same time, she would feel compelled by the powerful forces of her complete marital bond to do so.

There are several interacting hardships:

MEDICAL

USC has significant health issues which can be impacted negatively, even to the point of being life-threatening, if she does not have access to regular, expert medical care.

USC has a pituitary microadenoma (a small tumor of the pituitary gland). In brief, she has to take medication daily (Parlodel) toward containing the growth of the tumor and arresting its effects. Often, with medication a microadenoma of this sort will remain stable and its symptoms will be muted. However, sometimes, symptoms (including loss of vision) multiply, and sometimes, the tumor grows significantly. Expanding symptomatology or tumor size may lead to the necessity for intra-cranial surgery. One of her physicians, ______________, M.D. has asserted, “...It is critical that she be followed by an endocrinologist and have access to high-tech pituitary imaging facilities." Another of her specialists, ______________, M.D. wrote, “…If the mass enlarges significantly it can cause multiple problems...vision can be affected...Pressure can be placed on the base of the brain, which can cause many problems. She should be cared for in a “first world” as opposed to a third world country for this condition” [Appendix A]. In other words, follow-up care needs to be done by a specially trained physician and the regular use of MRI technology is critical. If the tumor should not respond properly to medication or should grow undetected she risks the loss of vision as well as other significant symptoms. Clearly, if surgery becomes a requirement, a highly trained physician would be necessary to protect USC's health.

As Appendix A attests, health conditions in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY are not adequate to meet USC's needs for care of her pituitary tumor. There is a scarcity of MRI facilities, endocrinologists, well-trained surgeons and general medical care. If USC were to live in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY, she would be placed at significant, specific risk relative to her pituitary adenoma because she could not obtain the necessary follow-up care, i.e. an endocrinologist and available pituitary imaging facilities. Further, if the tumor developed to the point where surgery was required, there is no evidence that an adequately trained surgeon could be found in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY.

Moreover, as a graduate student, USC is eligible for health insurance through the school. This is a fairly inexpensive product and covers her basic health needs, including a the twice yearly MRI exams recommended by her physicians for the pituitary tumor. This product will not cover her overseas. [Moreover, if she stops being a student she is no longer eligible for the plan]. To purchase a policy which does cover her while she is living in another country could be costly. Moreover, should she require medical care that is not available overseas, the cost of an evacuation to the United States is estimated at $50,000. In short, a move to a foreign country would significantly raise the cost of USC’s health insurance, if she can acquire it, and potentially raise other health costs as well.

If USC became pregnant while in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY, there would be increased risks to her health and that of an infant that she carried because of the quality of healthcare. In SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY mortality rates for babies and pregnant women are significantly higher than in the USA [Appendix E]. USC, herself, was born with a significant heart defect (now corrected). Additionally, she has two paternal cousins who were born with heart defects. Each required open-heart surgery as an infant. When USC’s sister was born the physicians insisted that a pediatric cardiologist be on call in case she was born with a heart defect. Few countries, SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY included, have the pediatric cardiological care available in the USA. Probably no other country has the quality of pediatric surgeons. Since 3 out of 10 paternal cousins were born with a heart defect the risks are high that a child of USC and ALIEN would also have a similar problem. Health care in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY is not adequate to meet the special needs of an infant with cardiac problems.

Thorough psychological evaluation in 2001 established that USC was essentially an emotionally healthy and normal individual [See Appendix A]. However, more current psychological appraisal indicates that USC has vulnerability to the development of depression and anxiety symptoms. In fact, she has already begun to develop such symptoms. [Appendix A].

Current psychological evaluation also establishes that USC would be at high risk for the development of psychiatric problems should she need to change her country of residence, whether or not that country was SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY. Psychiatric symptoms could interact negatively with her physical health. [Appendix A].



EDUCATIONAL and ECONOMIC

USC is currently a graduate student in Psychology at SCHOOL, CITY, STATE. As the documents in the Appendix B attest, she is a student in very good standing and is expected to successfully complete all requirements for her Ph.D. in ___________________. With this degree in hand she could be expected to earn annually $60,000 to $120,000, depending upon the context of her employment. [Appendix B, statistics from _______________________]

No evidence could be found of a university in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY that offers an equivalent degree. Moreover, She could obtain neither the assistance nor materials in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY to conduct the necessary research to continue her career. In other words, if she lived in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY it would terminate her pursuit of the Ph.D., which is considered to be the usual terminal degree necessary to be employed in the field of _____________________. SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY is an economically depressed country. Even if a job were available to her on the basis of her current level of achievement in _______________, it is unlikely that she could earn more than $15,000 per year. On the other hand, it is unlikely that she would be employable at all in the field of _________________, particularly since there are few available jobs.

To this date USC has borrowed over $35,000 in school loans and expenses [Appendix B]. Assuming that she earned a “higher end” wage of $15,000 in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY, her ability to pay off her student loans and debts would be nearly impossible. If ALIEN were in this country he could work as he continued his education, and the couple could conjointly handle the debt.

Again, it should be noted that these educational and economic hardships are interactive with her health [See Section II].

FAMILY TIES

It is particularly noteworthy that USC's mother suffers with Multiple Sclerosis. [See Appendix D]. Currently, she uses a wheelchair or "scooter" for most of her mobility needs. The type of MS from which she suffers is progressive, i.e. it involves periods of stability followed by outbreaks of the disease, which lead to a new plateau of decline and dysfunction. It is clear that there will be further decline. In fact, in December 2001 was in the hospital with an MS relapse. At that time, the doctors were uncertain as to whether or not she would ever recover enough to resume independent living. Because her condition is already somewhat marginal in terms of independence, it is likely that, within the next few years, she will reach a point where she will require regular family care.

USC has a very close relationship with her mother. Without a doubt, when her mother reaches a state of decline whereby she requires regular family assistance, USC wants to be one of those people who will offer a high level of assistance. If she would be unable to respond to her mother's need when the time comes, this would be an extreme hardship on USC.

Additionally, USC is emotionally attached to a maternal uncle, a survivor of pancreatic cancer and quadruple bypass surgery, who was recently diagnosed with prostate cancer. USC's whole family, with the exception of a few very distant relatives in Ireland, resides in the United States of America. She has four siblings, with whom she maintains affectionate relationships. She has a young niece and nephew whom she would like to see often. She is close to her mother, father, and stepmother. She looks forward to seeing her maternal aunt and uncle and paternal aunts, uncles and cousins. With ALIEN, USC plans to live and work on the _________ Coast, as close as possible to her family.

USC has no family in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY.

It is also noteworthy that, if ALIEN is not admitted to the USA, he is likely to experience emotional decline. As documented through the psychological evaluation of ALIEN [Appendix F], he is a young man who relies upon family contact and is vulnerable to depression. If he is admitted to the United States, he will have unfettered access to USC's family. Additionally, he has a grandfather, uncles, aunts and several cousins in the United States. (One of his cousins, _________, is currently serving in the U.S. Air Force). He has little sense of hope that he can be an asset to his family from within SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY and already is feeling guilty about having caused hardships for his wife and family. If USC had to abandon her goals, risk her health and move to SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY, it would only increase his depression. If he were not admitted and USC could not move to SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY for health reasons, his emotional equilibrium could be expected to decline. Under those conditions, his depression would obviously impact USC negatively and exacerbate those hardships that she already would be experiencing.

II. THE HOLMES-RAHE SOCIAL READJUSTMENT RATING
SCALE [see APPENDIX A.]

In 1967 Thomas H. Holmes, M.D. and Richard H. Rahe, M.D. published in the prestigious Journal of Psychosomatic Research, "The Social Readjustment Rating Scale". This scale is now famous. Its efficacy is well established. For instance, in December 2000 in Educational and Psychological Measurement Judith A. Scully, Henry Tosi and Kevin Banning re-evaluated the use of this instrument. The abstract of their article states:

"The authors conclude that, in sum, life change events remain useful predictors of stress related-symptom scores and that the SRRS is a robust instrument for identifying the potential for the occurrence of stress-related outcomes and is, therefore, a useful tool..." [Appendix A.]

The scale uses the weighting of Life Changes Units (LCU's) as a means of being able to predict vulnerability to medical illness. For instance, a marital separation would accrue 65 LCU's and an outstanding personal achievement would accrue 28 LCU's. In other words, significant life changes, positive and negative, which occur with frequency and intensity, are significant variables in the development of medical illness. It is not possible to predict exactly which illness might occur. However, degree of vulnerability can be predicted. (Pre-existing conditions are presumed to be highly vulnerable to exacerbation).

The following are the predictive ranges of the Holmes-Rahe Social Readjustment Rating Scale:

LCU<150>300: 80% Chance of illness or injury in two year period


In consultation with an independent psychologist, this Scale was applied to USC (on the assumed basis that she was forced to move to SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY). USC's score on this instrument was "603". On the other hand, if ALIEN were admitted to the USA her score would drop dramatically to 71 [Appendix A].

If she is forced to move to SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY, she is clearly within the highest-risk range of developing medical illness or injury in the two years following her move.

The Holmes-Rahe SRRS also demonstrates a very important fact widely recognized in the health sciences. Stress and other risk factors not only exist as independent influences, they interact dynamically. In other words, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. USC is being subjected to, or may be subjected to, factors whose interactions contribute exponentially to her experience of hardship. The factors herein delineated are more than additive. Each interacts with the other in a dynamic manner that potentates and heightens their mutual impact upon USC. Therefore, the totality of hardship factors exceeds measurement.


ON THE FINAL DRAFT A BRIEF SECTION ON FAMILY UNITY AND THE GOOD CHARACTER AND ADMISSIBILITY OF THE ALIEN WAS INCLUDED AT THIS POINT.

SUMMARY

This couple has full plans to spend their lives together. This includes residency in the United States, the generation of children, a shared religion, supportive relationships between the two families, mutual support in regard to educational and other life goals, etc.

Appendix J points to the complete nature of the marital union of ALIEN and USC. Their wedding, which occurred in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY was attended by all of ALIEN’s significant relatives. Moreover, critical members of USC’s family, including her mother, father, and biological brother witnessed the event. Her stepmother spent hundreds of hours in the hand making of her wedding gown.

It needs to be emphasized that by issuing an approval of the I-130 the United States government has formally and legally recognized the validity of the marriage between USC and ALIEN. It is well documented that “family unity” is an important value unpinning the raison d’etre of the United States of America and that actions to “assure family unity’ is part of the intent of U.S. immigration law [for example see Title 8, Chapter 12, Subchapter II, Part II, section I, pp. 64 and 65]. Although, it is a function of law to provide legal definition and recognition to this marriage between ALIEN and USC, it is clearly the intent of law to support the complex nature of marriage. In other words, in this and other genuine marriages there are multiple social psychological, familial, economic, cultural, spiritual, etc bonds which are presumed by the law to exist conjointly with the legal presence of marriage. Support for these complex, interacting marital bonds is a fundamental value of the larger society and a function of the law.

Because this is a full and complete marriage with intense emotional, social, familial, economic, and spiritual ties, USC reciprocal bond with ALIEN must be granted great weight while accessing what would happen to USC if ALIEN were not admitted to the United States. All extra hardships are built upon the base of significant, although usual hardship. In other words, it is of note that USC misses her husband painfully, is uncertain and frightened about her future because it depends upon the status of her husband, etc. However, these are considered herein to be “simply “ the backdrop from those other, previously listed hardships that, individually and when combined and interacting are severe. In other words, the enormous strain of being separated from her husband constitutes a powerful hardship on USC. The other hardships on top of this one culminate in her being potentially and actually subjected to extreme and unusual hardship.

In short, if ALIEN is not admitted to the United States of America USC will be placed in the midst of an impossible dilemma. Because the marriage has occurred in its full sense, profound forces (recognized at least implicitly by the United States government) will move her to leave her homeland. Yet, if she goes to SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY, she will place herself in Jeopardy. SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY is economically depressed, has poor health care (by U.S. standards) and cannot provide USC with the educational opportunities necessary for her to continue to pursue her career path. [See Appendix E.] Furthermore, she would be unavailable to family, especially in regard to the care of her mother, stricken with MS. Most of all, by moving to SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY USC would set into motion emotional, social, and medical forces that could prove life threatening to her. Her “Sophie’s choice” would place her squarely between her marital bond and her own survival.

If ALIEN is not admitted to the United States, the obvious thing for USC to do would be to move to SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY where ALIEN resides. However, USC has significant health conditions. If not properly treated, or if allowed to exacerbate, she would face risks of losing her eyesight, undergoing intra-cranial surgery, and developing psychiatric symptoms. There is no evidence of proper care in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY. If she were forced to live in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY, a long established, scientifically based, approach (the Holmes-Rahe Scale) overwhelmingly indicates that she would suffer at least an 80% risk of significant illness of injury within a two-year frame of moving to SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY.

There are no institutions in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY that offer equivalent education. If forced to move to SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY, she would have to abandon her pursuit of a Ph.D. and the economic advantages associated with it. It is unlikely that she could make enough money to keep up with her current debts.

ALIEN sees no hope in SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY. He already feels guilty. His psychological profile identifies existing depression which would undoubtedly exacerbate if his wife was forced to live in conditions he would consider oppressive to her. If USC were forced to move to SOUTH AMERICAN COUNTRY, his increased depression would obviously impact USC negatively and exacerbate those hardships that she is already experiencing. As illustrated by the Holmes-Rahe Scale, each of these extreme hardships work interactively and, in dynamic combination, they produce an even more destructive effect upon USC.

Activities related to residing illegally in the USA express an isolated and unusual circumstance for ALIEN. He is deeply repentant, a changed man. The 20-year-old, who allowed himself to become trapped inside of lies, no longer exists. He has returned to himself. He is goal directed, focused and thoroughly ethical and law-abiding. He presents no danger whatsoever to the interests of the United States of America.

latacunga
07-13-2008, 09:37 PM
Adjudicated indicates they went or will go through Panama. Are these being posted for comment or are they actually waivers that were approved? It would be helpful to see examples of approved waivers through Panama. thanks for the clarification.

Laura
07-13-2008, 11:26 PM
These were actually approved in Panama.